Our Enterprise beta is live! Apply here.
Learn More
In hands-off management, employers do not require direct supervision of employees while they perform their jobs. This is typically done in three situations:
The employee receives adequate feedback from colleagues or higher level managers about his/her performance ___________ (the job).
The employee has regular meetings with superiors to discuss progress and get encouragement for continued good work __________________(working relationships)
There are always at least one or two people around the employee who can step into her position if she leaves the workplace temporarily
These individuals have access to the same resources as the employee and know what tasks need to be performed! They can pick up where she left off when she returns.
This type of management is most common in professions that depend heavily on external sources for success, such as lawyers, journalists, and educators. Because these professionals are often in separate rooms or buildings from their colleagues, they rely more on other workers and departments to help them achieve their goals.
In fact, there are many examples of successful entrepreneurs and business leaders that operated with very little managerial oversight. Think about it – how many CEOs manage every aspect of their company?
Hands-on management is the opposite end of the spectrum. In this style of leadership, employers make all significant decisions by themselves without input or advice from others. Both types of management styles can be effective depending on the leader, the organization, and the situation.
That is, monitoring and controlling every minute detail of an organization’s performance.
Most people associate the term ‘micromanage’ with having control freak bosses that can be very demanding. But the true definition of this word refers to something totally different – management strategies that create a high level of trust.
A manager who uses micromanagement may also refer to themselves as a leader or even a taskmaster. They feel responsible for making sure everything runs smoothly in their department, but they don’t stick around long enough to see if it gets done!
Instead of investing time in individuals, they spend most of their energy ensuring things run like clockwork within their area. This usually creates a sense of isolation and lack of motivation for employees.
It also puts a lot of pressure on those workers, because they are expected to do excellent work without help from anyone else. In fact, these pressures often have a negative effect on morale and productivity.
Research shows that when you place a higher value on individual success than group success, it can hurt organizational effectiveness. When everyone feels obligated to perform well solely due to their own goals and aspirations, teamwork breaks down.
In contrast, when groups focus more on achieving collective goals, creativity dies and solidarity fades. As a result, good intentions go unrealized and efficiency drops.
That’s why there is a difference between being a command-and-control boss and using effective leadership techniques.
One of the biggest mistakes that new managers make is trying to be too involved with their reports. The tendency here is usually to feel needed and wanted, which can quickly get overwhelming. If you’ve got a lot of people reporting up you, then you’re sure to have a lot of work!
As a manager, there will always be something you need to do. Your job includes making decisions, solving problems, finding solutions, motivating others – all of these things take time and effort.
If someone was consistently going out of their way to make you feel important, it could easily distract you from doing your job. This would not only affect you, but also your team members under you.
On top of this, excessive involvement may hurt relationships. Your colleagues might no longer trust you or view you as an authority figure.
Hands off managers understand how much responsibility they bear and don’t feel obligated to help other people achieve their goals. They may even go so far as to discourage such efforts, since that’s what made them successful in the past.
By staying focused on getting things done, he/she removes any barriers that may prevent his/her staff from working as hard as possible.
Micromanaging behaviors are those that require constant supervision or intervention to relax you need someone who will keep an eye on your job partner, manager, or supervisor.
Being a master manager means being aware of what others around you are doing and ensuring they're performing their jobs effectively. This can be tricky sometimes though, as people have different styles for completing tasks.
People may feel overwhelmed by the amount of work that has to get done and how much time there is to do it. They may also worry about getting bad results which could affect their own career if these things aren’t fixed soon.
As a leader, you must develop a sense of empathy for this. You must understand where people come from and motivate them in ways that they are motivated already.
One of the biggest reasons why employers have such a hard time developing loyal, productive employees is because they are constantly changing jobs or being promoted within the organization. This happens due to a lack of stability in an employee’s career.
When someone changes positions, it can be confusing for them what things are considered “normal” workplace practices. These informal norms include everything from how you address your colleagues, to whether you should contribute money to a party, or if it's appropriate to ingest alcohol while on duty.
Without these guidelines, people may feel uncomfortable performing their job properly. This can negatively affect the organization both financially and professionally.
It also creates a feeling of insecurity for individuals who work for the company, as well as those outside the organization that depend on the products or services the company provides.
I've seen this effect occur many times, and it always ends badly for the employer. They will spend lots of money on employment contracts and benefits, but still not get the quality staff they want. Or worse, they'll fire an individual, and then later find out that person was secretly sabotaging projects and opportunities at their previous position.
This situation could cost far more than just financial losses. It could hurt the organization morally, socially, and psychologically.
As discussed before, being in hands-on manager mode can sometimes be a tough position to hold onto. When you are in this state of mind, your job seems impossible and you feel like giving up.
This is not a good place for you to be as a leader. You need to recognize that it’s possible to work at a level where you don’t have to manage every detail of your department, but you still want to leave room for people to succeed.
It’s also important to remember that even if someone isn’t performing their jobs well, there may be reasons beyond poor performance that make them unsuitable for their positions.
By letting go of the reins, you allow other team members to step up and take control. This creates an atmosphere of trust which helps motivate others to do their best. It also gives them permission to try new things because they believe that they will get support from you.
If you're already in a hands off style then great! But if you're not, here are some tips on how to use the technique.
As discussed earlier, managers who use more direct instruction typically do not last very long-they are either too strict or lenient with their employees.
Directors and senior management team members often feel they have to be constantly in control of every aspect of an employee’s work life due to the position that person holds. This can easily become excessive and unhealthy for both parties involved.
As a manager, you must realize that your staff will also need some degree of autonomy at times. They will need to understand that you cannot do everything for them, but that they still deserve your support when they go beyond what is asked of them.
It is important to establish clear roles and responsibilities at all levels of an organization. However, once those roles are filled, it is up to each individual member whether they want to take on additional responsibility or not.
One of the biggest criticisms of active managers is that they manage their own portfolio, which can be very expensive for shareholders if the investments fail to perform well.
By having investors choose their own investment strategies, active fund managers get credit for improving performance by choosing better stocks or investing in new market segments, but they also get blamed when things go wrong.
In fact, according to some studies, around one-third of actively managed funds underperform their benchmark index over five years![1]
This has caused many investors to question whether it’s more beneficial to hire a professional manager or do your own research and invest accordingly. And with all the talk about owning stock through robo-advisors like Wealthfront and Betterment, it seems like everyone has an opinion on this topic.
The first major drawback of hands-off managers is that they may not know what their employees are doing. If you’re looking to improve employee efficiency, motivation, or productivity, your best bet is to ask about it.
If an employee notices that something seems out of place in the workplace, they might mention it to their manager. Or if they notice bad behavior such as harassment or discrimination, they can speak up.
By knowing how each member of your team operates, you will be able to identify any potential problems early. You can then take appropriate action by talking to the person about it or changing the settings for the individual so that you never have to worry about them letting things get out of hand.
Hands-off managers sometimes make changes without consulting others because they believe everyone should know everything about every aspect of the company. But this isn’t always practical nor effective, especially when there are other departments involved.
It’s also important to remember that some people feel like they don’t have anyone they can talk to about issues. For these individuals, walking around with a piece of paper listing all the little mistakes people make can be a way to deal with their stress.
